[ad_1]
Aside from stats in the UEFA Conference League and against the European minnows, the Harry Kane we know has yet to see the light of day this season.
In the midst of * the * summer transfer saga, the England the captain was billed on a summer pass of over £ 120million to Manchester city and ultimately, Kane was forced to reluctantly promise his future at Tottenham.
A number of questions were asked to the triple premier league winner of the Golden Shoe since then.
However, the stats – seven goals in 11 games for Tottenham and three out of four for England this season – don’t tell the whole story on this occasion.
Indeed, after missing a win on Matchday 1 against City as he accepted to see a dream move go down the drain, Kane only launched his Premier League account on Sunday afternoon against Newcastle in difficulty – who has not yet reaped the benefits of this. Saudi-backed £ 305million takeover.
Depending on your point of view, there are two contrary statements to be made here.
City dodged a £ 120million ball in the chase to sign a replacement for Sergio Aguero – now at Barcelona – or Kane would have been revitalized by this potential change and may have already scored goals galore alongside teammates internationals such as Phil Foden and £ 100m man Jack Grealish.
Grealish, of course, was deemed worthy of such an expense this summer.
However, as Pep guardiola explained in August, there was a vital difference when it came to negotiating with Aston Villa and Tottenham respectively.
He said: “He’s a player for Tottenham and if they don’t want to negotiate it’s over.
“If they’re open to negotiation, but Man City and all the clubs in the world want to sign him. Jack [Grealish] had a release clause – so it was different. Harry [Kane] is an exceptional forward, we are interested, of course, but if they don’t want to negotiate, we can’t. “
Who was your Man of the City vs Club Brugge match? :
In short, it explains what happened, even though reality played out the storyline over several weeks and months.
At first glance, these two counter-arguments from above may compartmentalize the way fans view the transfer saga, but the silver lining, so to speak, is buried somewhere in between – in that area usually reserved for gray.
Whether City return for Kane in January (unlikely) or in 12 months, the strong position Tottenham once held due to his contract, which expires in 2024, will have weakened considerably and, as a result, Daniel Levy will no longer be able. to order such a tempting fee for his prolific scoring services.
Despite this “failure” in the market, City remain the team to beat this season.
Of course, this promises to be more competitive than Guardiola ideally would like, but Chelsea, Liverpool and certainly Manchester United have their own issues – and stumbling blocks – when it comes to a potential property right.
© Matt Dunham – Pool / Getty Images
Man City paid £ 100million for Grealish (right) but missed England captain Kane.
In this sense, the key figures responsible for transactions at the Etihad stadium could have played this one to the full.
Indeed, the possible price on which they will settle for Kane will have been reduced, or City will win a “goal-den” ticket for the sensation of Borussia Dortmund. Erling Haaland in 2022.
Which striker should City target next summer? Give your opinion in the comments section below.
The dominoes could still fall in another direction, but Chelsea and United have made a commitment by signing Romelu Lukaku and Cristiano Ronaldo respectively. City, it seems, have a choice between Kane or Haaland.
Ultimately, if the latter moves to Bayern Munich, that in turn could free Polish great Robert Lewandowski – and there’s a three-way junction that Guardiola just can’t take a wrong turn at.
Sign up for our City newsletter to never miss an update from the Etihad Stadium this sraison.
[ad_2]
Source link
