The silver lining of San Francisco’s “reminder fever”



You’ve probably heard the alerts and alarms. The country, it is said, is in the grip of a “recall fever”.

The result, critics insist, is that every madman with a cause – from the school curriculum to voter fraud – can put city and state officials on a ballot and force them to defend their position. The mantra is that we have to stop this runaway tactic before it undermines democracy.

I don’t buy it.

In fact, I would say, as San Francisco proves with school board and district attorney Chesa Boudin, that reminders are not only effective, they are a valuable amplifier for ordinary people.

Now, first, we must recognize an unfortunate truth. Recall elections cost far too much. Governor Gavin Newsom’s unsuccessful recall reportedly cost $ 276 million. Even for a state with a projection budget surplus of over $ 75 billion, that’s a lot of money.

The San Francisco Unified School Board recall is expected to reach around $ 8 million. Supervisor Rafael Mandelman proposed that instead of the cash-strapped school district paying, TCity should foot the bill.

It should. They are not a bunch of cranks with a cause. These are parents, residents and proud San Franciscans rising up – and in great numbers.

But, you say, with all these callbacks, where will it end?

Well, for starters, in general, the recalls have been remarkably unsuccessful.

Yes, there are a lot of recall attempts across the country. And yes, they have increased recently. The Ballotpedia website followed 29 recalls from school boards in the country in 2020. In 2021, the site identified 82.

But it’s a thing of announce a reminder. It is much more difficult to remove someone from office.

Even going to an election is not a slam dunk.

Of the 29 recalls that Ballotpedia studied last year, only four were successful. And of the 64 school board members who were targeted, only five were recalled, for a success rate of 7.8%.

Which brings us to another point: callbacks are difficult. We’re talking about raising the bar to force an election, but the evidence shows it takes a ton of time, money and more money.

In San Francisco, the signing threshold to force recall three school board members or district attorney Chesa Boudin was 50,000. Organizers estimated they needed to get at least 70,000 signatures to cover for false or unverifiable.

That’s a lot of people, especially considering that there are only 504,000 registered voters in The City. In our block, there was a table with a volunteer collecting reminder signatures from the school board every weekend for at least a month.

And a signature campaign in San Francisco almost certainly means using paid signature collectors, who can get up to $ 1 to $ 3 per signature. It is getting expensive. You need financial support.

Which brings us to another big truth about recall elections. If you get to an election, you must have really pissed off some people.

Because, once again, recalls are commonplace. In California, there have been 55 recall attempts to oust governors, six of which were aimed at Gavin Newsom. And he is still in his first term.

But none of these went anywhere until the time of Newsom’s French laundry, when he was seen having dinner, inside a chic Wine Country restaurant, after saying people to stay for the COVID lockdown.

People were furious at the hypocrisy, and Republicans and conservative corporate donors – no models – saw Newsom in trouble and threw money away, over $ 4.7 million. After five failed attempts, opponents finally brought Newsom to an election.

And, as we know, he won out in a landslide. This is what history would have predicted. As NPR points out, only two governors’ recalls were successful. One was Gray Davis in 2003 and the other was North Dakota Governor Lynn Frazier in 1921.

In San Francisco, the three struggling school board members – Alison Collins, Faauuga Moliga and Gabriela López – consistently failed to read the play. They embarked on fanciful far-left quests as parents eager to get their kids back to school.

The council’s inaction, lack of accountability and silent decision to rename schools during a pandemic galvanized opposition. The stopper was Collins’ frivolous $ 87 million lawsuit. Supporters of the recall did not get 70,000 signatures; they have over 80,000.

Meanwhile, some of the anger directed at DA Boudin comes from a city that does not feel safe from crime. Boudin is the police officer, so he is blamed.

But he did not use promises to “dismantle the war on drugs”. And his pledge to replace “incarceration” with “decarceration”, putting fewer people in prison, during a period of anxiety about thefts, car break-ins and assaults, fueled the recall effort.

Which brings up another result of a recall – it concentrates the problems. Last week, two prosecutors in the DA’s office, Brooke Jenkins and Don Du Bain, not only resigned, but are actively campaigning for the recall. According to NBCBayArea, they are among the 51 lawyers who have resigned or have been dismissed since Boudin took office in January 2020.

It all has an effect. On October 22, the organizers of the recall said they had collected more than 83,000 signatures, 30,000 more than needed.

Boudin clearly paid attention. In a virtual town hall in August, he insisted on citing his harsh crime figures, 7,000 new criminal cases filed, including charges laid in 80% of burglaries.

We’ll see if that gets voters moving.

Newsom made the same pivot when it became clear the recall was a real threat. He came out and called on a group of Democratic A-list heavyweights – President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and Senators Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren, to name a few – a few.

It had an effect. Newsom rallied supporters, reset priorities and admitted the recall was “humiliating.” The voters bought him and returned him to power easily.

So, reconsideration: Reminders are expensive, but in reality, getting to the poll is a lot harder than you might think. And because the standard is high, when a group hits it and forces a recall election, it lends credibility to their concerns and makes them feel like they have power and are not helpless. .

And finally, a reminder can actually be a good thing for an elected official. We know the story of Newsom.

But you might not have seen the results of last month’s recall election in Sonoma County. District Attorney Jill Ravitch has been targeted by exactly the kind of wealthy, self-interested idiot who recalls the fear of naysayers.

Bill Gallagher, owner of Oakmont Senior Living, has been sued by Ravitch’s office for allegedly abandoning more than 100 elderly residents in two nursing homes in 2017 as the deadly Tubbs blaze approached.

Gallagher settled the lawsuit, but was reportedly furious. The campaign’s sole financier, Gallagher invested some $ 1.7 million in television, radio and social media ads, personally attacking Ravitch. With the barrage, he managed to get the recall in an election.

“He was an angry man who was held responsible”, Ravitch noted. “And he had a temper tantrum.”

Yet his efforts were crushed – 79.95% to 20.05% – allowing Ravitch to complete his tenure.

What’s more than a reminder can provide: a vote of confidence.

Contact CW Nevius at Twitter: @cwnevius

Source link


Comments are closed.